Does the Hume Pod Actually Work?

Yes—our Hume Pod is built on science. Our products are grounded in research and tested against medical-grade devices. In an independent study conducted by Socotech, the Hume Pod was shown to be within ±3% accuracy of a DEXA scan—the gold standard for body composition measurement.We're so confident in our accuracy and results that we offer a 45-day no-questions-asked trial and return policy. Try it for yourself and feel the difference.

Yes! A Premium subscription is not required to use your scale. You can still enjoy the Hume Health app for free and access essential features like weighing-in and viewing body measurements.However, certain advanced features are reserved for Premium (Hume Plus) users, including:A comprehensive weekly Health Report that examines: - Body Composition - Activity - SleepPersonalized health insights & recommendations to achieve your goalsAnd so much more!

Can it be used by multiple users?

Yes! The Hume Pod can connect to multiple accounts. Each user should log in with their own Hume Account for accurate tracking.Like all Bluetooth devices, the Hume Pod can only connect to one phone at a time. To weigh in, simply open your Hume Health App and step on the scale. However, if another paired user is nearby with their app open, they may need to close their app to free up the Hume Pod’s connection for you

Are these technologies safe?

Yes—the Hume Pod’s BIA (Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis) technology is completely safe and has been widely used for over 20 years. What sets us apart is our patented BIA frequency, which allows for greater accuracy compared to other smart Hume Pods.For customers with cardiac devices like pacemakers or ICDs implanted after 1992, our Hume Pod is safe to use. Multiple studies have shown no interference with CIEDs (Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices) during BIA measurements.Your safety and trust are our top priorities—and our technology reflects that.

Does it show weekly trends in a graph?

Yes! Hume tracks your progress over time and displays your data in easy-to-read graphs. You can view your weekly, monthly, and yearly averages for weight and other key health metrics. This makes it simple to spot trends, track your progress, and stay motivated on your health journey.

What Does my Warranty Cover?

1-Year WarrantyThink of this as your Hume safety net. If your device ever runs into a hiccup due to a product defect—like a sensor glitch or anything not working the way it should—we’re on it. Just give us a shout, and we’ll send you a free replacement to keep things running smoothly. No stress, no fuss, just support when you need it.10-Year WarrantyGo long—like really long—with our 10-year warranty. It covers the same product defect protection as our 1-year plan, but for a whole decade. If your device ever stops working as expected due to a defect, we’ll replace it for free. And if it ever happens again? Your second replacement is 50% off. It’s peace of mind for the long haul, with a little bonus built in.

If I don’t like it? Can I return it?

Absolutely! We’re confident you’ll love your Hume product—but if it’s not the right fit, no worries. That’s why we offer a 45-day trial so you can try it out, commitment-free. If you decide to return it, just reach out to our customer service team first. They’ll share the return instructions—and once you ship it back to us, we’ll take it from there.

What is the maximum weight?

The scale supports a maximum weight of 400 lbs (181.4 kg). If exceeded, the scale will display an error. The scale has a minimum measurable weight of 6.6 lbs (3 kg).

Weighing-in for the first time?

Place your scale on an uncarpeted, flat surface.Ensure your phone’s Bluetooth is active.With bare feet (no socks), step onto your scale until it displays 0.00.If your scale is not turning on, please charge it.Open the Hume Health app and tap “Measurement.” Select the Hume Pod from the list of available devices.Pull the handles, stand fully upright facing forward, and hold the Hume Pod handles steady with both hands.Remain in place, upright on the scale and holding both handles steady, until the Hume Health app signals that your weigh-in is complete.Checklist:Uncarpeted, flat surfaceStanding upright and barefootHolding the handles steady at waist heightWaiting for your Hume Health app to notify you that your weigh-in is complete

How to get the best results?

Start your day with a morning weigh-in for consistent tracking, minimizing daily fluctuations influenced by meals and fluids.Try to keep the same time and place for your weigh-ins.Remember: Weight can vary day to day and even hour to hour. It is important to focus on trends. By focusing on these trends, you get a clearer picture of your progress and patterns.Stay flexible. If you miss your usual time, don’t skip the day; just do it later.

{ "type": "slideout", "content": { "title": "45-Metric List", "content": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCore totals (20)\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eWeight\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eBMI\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eBody Fat Rate (aka body fat %)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eBody Fat Percentage\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eFat Mass\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eMuscle Mass\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eSkeletal Muscle Mass\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eMuscle vs Fat Ratio\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eVisceral Fat\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eMetabolic Age\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eBasal Metabolic Rate (BMR)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eHydration (status\/level)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eWater Weight\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eTotal Body Water (TBW)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eIntracellular Water (ICW)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eExtracellular Water (ECW)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eProtein Levels\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eBone mineral content \/ “bone” metric (often marketed as bone density)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eHeart health \u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eFull-body segmental scan coverage (arms\/torso\/legs)\u003cbr\/\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ol\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSegmental fat % (5)\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eRight Arm Fat %\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLeft Arm Fat %\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eTrunk Fat %\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRight Leg Fat %\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLeft Leg Fat %\u003cbr\/\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ol\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSegmental muscle\/lean outputs (5)\u003cbr\/\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eRight Arm Muscle\/Lean (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLeft Arm Muscle\/Lean (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eTrunk Muscle\/Lean (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRight Leg Muscle\/Lean (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLeft Leg Muscle\/Lean (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ol\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSegmental muscle\/water balance ratings (5)\u003cbr\/\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eRight Arm Muscle\/Water Balance %\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLeft Arm Muscle\/Water Balance %\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eTorso Muscle\/Water Balance %\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRight Leg Muscle\/Water Balance %\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLeft Leg Muscle\/Water Balance %\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ol\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSegmental intracellular-water health (5)\u003cbr\/\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eRight Arm ICW health (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLeft Arm ICW health (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eTorso ICW health (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRight Leg ICW health (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLeft Leg ICW health (segmental)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ol\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eScoring + insights shown in creative (5)\u003cbr\/\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eOverall Health Score\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eBody Composition Grade\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eActivity Grade\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eSleep Grade\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRight-vs-left limb difference flag (lean\/muscle asymmetry callout)\u003cbr\/\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ol\u003e" }, "width": 750, "transitionDuration": 150 }

{ "type": "slideout", "content": { "title": "11-modal", "content": "\u003ch4\u003eLean Mass Preservation During GLP‑1-Assisted Weight Loss in Engaged Digital Health Program Participants\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eAn Outcomes Analysis of 6,990 Hume Health Premium Members\n \u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHume Health Corp • Internal Outcomes Analysis • 2024\n Correspondence: research@humehealth.com • Methodology available on request\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eABSTRACT\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eBackground.\u003c\/b\u003e GLP‑1 receptor agonists produce substantial weight loss but are associated with lean mass loss of\n 25–39%\n of total weight lost in published clinical trials. Lean mass is a primary determinant of resting metabolic rate, and\n its loss during weight reduction is associated with impaired weight maintenance following treatment cessation. This\n analysis examined lean mass outcomes in a real-world cohort of Hume Health premium platform members who met defined\n engagement criteria.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMethods.\u003c\/b\u003e Retrospective analysis of 6,990 Hume Health premium members on GLP‑1 therapy who completed a minimum\n of\n three body composition measurements per week via the Hume Body (8-sensor bioelectrical impedance analysis) and made\n weekly attestations of adherence to Pro.f AI protocol guidance. Body composition was measured at each weigh-in. The\n primary outcome was lean mass loss as a percentage of total weight lost, assessed from highest recorded weight (peak)\n to lowest recorded weight (nadir). Weighted mean lean mass loss was computed as the ratio of aggregate lean mass\n change to aggregate total weight lost across the full cohort.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eResults.\u003c\/b\u003e Mean baseline weight was 105.3 kg (SD 21.8). Mean total weight lost was 21.9 kg (SD 6.8),\n representing 21.3%\n of baseline body weight. The weighted mean lean mass loss as a percentage of total weight lost was 16.9%. The median\n lean mass loss as a percentage of total weight lost was 19.4%. A total of 12.7% of members preserved or increased lean\n mass over the measurement period. Among the 87.3% of members who lost lean mass, mean lean mass loss as a percentage\n of total weight lost was 22.0%.\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\n Conclusions. \u003c\/b\u003e Hume Health premium members on GLP‑1 therapy demonstrated lean mass loss substantially below the\n 25–39%\n range documented in published clinical trials. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that\n high-frequency\n body composition monitoring combined with AI-guided protocol adherence supports favorable body composition\n outcomes\n during medically assisted weight loss.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eKeywords:\u003c\/b\u003e \u003ci\u003eGLP‑1 receptor agonists; lean mass preservation; body composition; semaglutide; weight loss;\n bioelectrical impedance analysis; digital health\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n \n\u003ch4\u003e1. INTRODUCTION\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGlucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP‑1) receptor agonists represent a substantial advance in pharmacological obesity\n management. In the STEP 1 clinical trial, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg produced mean total body weight\n loss of 14.9% over 68 weeks, compared to 2.4% in the placebo group receiving lifestyle intervention alone —\n approximately 6.2 times greater weight loss than lifestyle intervention alone.¹\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever, a consistent finding across GLP‑1 clinical trials is that a meaningful proportion of weight lost derives\n from lean tissue rather than adipose tissue. Neeland et al. documented lean mass reductions of 40–60% of total weight\n lost in some GLP‑1 trial cohorts, with substantial heterogeneity across studies.² Prado et al., in a commentary in The\n Lancet Diabetes \u0026 Endocrinology, reported lean mass loss of 25–39% of total weight lost across medically induced\n weight loss programs.³\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis is clinically significant because skeletal muscle mass is a primary determinant of resting metabolic rate (RMR)\n — the baseline energy expenditure that determines whether a patient can sustain their new body weight after treatment\n ends.⁶ In the STEP 1 extension trial, participants who discontinued semaglutide without a structured metabolic exit\n protocol regained two-thirds of their prior weight loss within one year of stopping treatment.⁴\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Hume Health platform combines GLP‑1 therapy with high-frequency body composition measurement via bioelectrical\n impedance analysis (BIA), physician oversight informed by longitudinal tissue-level data, and an AI guidance system\n (Pro.f) that surfaces body composition patterns for clinical review and member adherence. This analysis examines\n whether this protocol-supported approach is associated with lean mass outcomes below published benchmarks.\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n \n\u003ch4\u003e2. METHODS\n\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2.1 Study Design\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis was a retrospective cohort analysis of real-world member data from the Hume Health platform. The analysis period\n spanned active program enrollment through March 2026. The study was conducted under Hume Health Corp internal data\n governance protocols. Member data were de-identified prior to analysis. The study did not constitute human subjects\n research requiring institutional review board oversight under 45 CFR 46 as it involved retrospective analysis of\n de-identified operational data.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2.2 Participants\n \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEligible participants were Hume Health premium members who: (1) were actively enrolled in a GLP‑1 therapy program\n during the analysis period; (2) completed a minimum of three Hume Body body composition measurements per week\n throughout the measurement window; and (3) completed weekly attestations confirming engagement with and adherence to\n Pro.f AI protocol guidance. Members who did not meet all three criteria were excluded from analysis.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2.3 Measurements\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBody weight and body composition were measured at each weigh-in using the Hume Pod, a bioelectrical impedance analysis\n device measuring whole-body and segmental lean mass, fat mass, and total body water. BIA measurements were recorded at\n consistent times relative to weigh-in. Lean mass at peak weight (highest recorded body weight during the measurement\n window) and lean mass at nadir weight (lowest recorded body weight) were identified for each member. Lean mass delta\n was computed as lean mass at nadir minus lean mass at peak. Weight loss was computed as peak weight minus nadir\n weight.\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLean mass loss as a percentage of total weight lost was computed for each member as: (|lean mass delta| \/ weight\n loss) × 100, where lean mass delta was negative for members who lost lean mass and positive for members who preserved\n or gained lean mass. The primary aggregate outcome — weighted mean lean mass loss as a percentage of total weight lost\n — was computed as: (sum of lean mass deltas across all members \/ sum of total weight lost across all members) × 100,\n reflecting the population-level ratio of lean mass change to total weight change.\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2.4 Statistical Analysis\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDescriptive statistics were computed for all primary and secondary outcomes. Continuous variables are reported as\n mean (standard deviation) and median. The weighted mean was used as the primary outcome measure for lean mass loss as\n a percentage of total weight lost, as it accounts for variation in total weight lost across members and reflects the\n aggregate population-level body composition response. Members who preserved or gained lean mass during the measurement\n period (lean mass delta ≥ 0) are included in all analyses; their inclusion in the weighted mean computation reduces\n the aggregate lean mass loss percentage relative to analyses restricted to members with lean mass loss.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e3. RESULTS\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e3.1 Participant Characteristics\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA total of 6,990 members met all eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics are\n presented in Table 1.\u003c\/p\u003e\n \n\u003cdiv class=\"table_drawer\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTable 1. Baseline Participant Characteristics (n = 6,990)\u003c\/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth\u003eCharacteristic\u003c\/th\u003e\n \u003cth\u003eValue\u003c\/th\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eSample size (n)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e6,990\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMean baseline weight, kg (SD)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e105.3 (21.8)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMedian baseline weight, kg\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e102.3\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMeasurement frequency (minimum)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e3 weigh-ins per week\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eProof engagement attestation\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eWeekly (required for inclusion)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n \n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e3.2 Weight Loss Outcomes\n \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMean total weight lost was 21.9 kg (SD 6.8), representing a mean reduction of 21.3% (SD 6.7%) of baseline body\n weight. Median weight lost was 19.6 kg, representing 20.0% of baseline body weight. Weight loss outcomes are presented\n in Table 2.\u003c\/p\u003e\n \n\u003cp\u003eTable 2. Weight Loss Outcomes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"table_drawer2\"\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth\u003eOutcome\u003c\/th\u003e\n \u003cth\u003eResult\u003c\/th\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMean weight loss, kg (SD)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e21.9 (6.8)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMedian weight loss, kg\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e19.6\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMean weight loss, % of baseline (SD)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e21.3% (6.7%)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMedian weight loss, % of baseline\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e20.0%\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMinimum weight loss, kg\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e15.7\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMaximum weight loss, kg\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e75.4\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e3.3 Lean Mass Outcomes\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe weighted mean lean mass loss as a percentage of total weight lost was 16.9% across all 6,990 members. The median\n lean mass loss as a percentage of total weight lost was 19.4%. A total of 890 members (12.7%) preserved or increased\n lean mass over the measurement period (lean mass delta ≥ 0). Among the 6,100 members (87.3%) who lost lean mass, the\n mean lean mass loss as a percentage of total weight lost was 22.0%. Lean mass outcomes are presented in Table 3.\u003c\/p\u003e\n \n\u003cp\u003eTable 3. Lean Mass Outcomes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"table_drawer3\"\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth\u003eOutcome\u003c\/th\u003e\n \u003cth\u003eResult\u003c\/th\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eWeighted mean lean mass loss, % of total weight lost (all members)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e16.9%\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMedian lean mass loss, % of total weight lost (all members)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e19.4%\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMembers preserving or gaining lean mass, n (%)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e890 (12.7%)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMembers losing lean mass, n (%)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e6,100 (87.3%)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003eMean lean mass loss, % of total weight lost (among those with lean mass loss)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e22.0%\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003ePublished benchmark (Prado et al., 2024; Neeland et al., 2024)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003ctd\u003e25–39% (range across GLP-1 trials)\u003c\/td\u003e\n \u003c\/tr\u003e\n \u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n \n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e3.4 Interpretation of the Weighted Mean Outcome\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe weighted mean of 16.9% reflects the aggregate population-level ratio of total lean mass change to total weight\n lost across all members. Because members who preserved or gained lean mass (12.7% of the cohort) contribute negative\n lean mass loss values to the numerator, the weighted mean is lower than the mean computed among members who lost lean\n mass exclusively (22.0%). Both measures are reported to provide transparency regarding cohort composition. The\n weighted mean is the primary outcome because it most accurately represents the population-level body composition\n impact of the program.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e4. DISCUSSION\n\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis analysis demonstrates that Hume Health premium members on GLP‑1 therapy, who met defined body composition\n monitoring and AI protocol engagement criteria, experienced lean mass loss substantially below the benchmarks\n documented in published GLP‑1 clinical trials. The weighted mean lean mass loss of 16.9% of total weight lost compares\n favorably to the 25–39% range reported by Prado et al.³ and the 40–60% upper range reported in some cohorts by Neeland\n et al.²\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe mechanism by which frequent body composition measurement and protocol-guided engagement may attenuate lean mass\n loss is consistent with established physiology. Skeletal muscle mass is the primary determinant of resting metabolic\n rate.⁶ Interventions that preserve lean mass during caloric restriction — including higher protein intake, resistance\n exercise, and dose calibration timed to body composition response — are documented to reduce lean mass loss during\n weight reduction. The Hume platform protocol facilitates tissue-level visibility that enables these calibrations in\n near real-time; the present analysis cannot isolate which components of the program contributed to the observed\n outcomes.\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe finding that 12.7% of members preserved or gained lean mass during GLP‑1-assisted weight loss is notable. This\n subgroup is likely influenced by favorable baseline characteristics, behavioral factors, and variability in BIA\n measurement across conditions, and should not be interpreted as a program-level guarantee of lean mass preservation.\n Its inclusion in the weighted mean reduces the reported aggregate lean mass loss figure relative to analyses\n restricted to members who lost lean mass.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e4.1 Limitations\n \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis analysis has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting results. First, the study is\n retrospective and observational, without a concurrent control group. Comparison to published clinical trial benchmarks\n involves differences in population, measurement methodology, and GLP‑1 agent. Second, body composition was measured\n via bioelectrical impedance analysis rather than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or magnetic resonance imaging\n (MRI), which are considered the reference standards for lean mass quantification. BIA measurements are sensitive to\n hydration status, time of measurement, and device calibration, and may produce systematic differences relative to\n DXA-derived lean mass values. Third, the cohort consists of premium-tier members who met a minimum engagement\n threshold; results may not generalize to members with lower engagement frequency or to non-engaged GLP‑1 users.\n Fourth, no information on dietary protein intake, resistance exercise participation, or specific GLP‑1 agent and\n dosing schedule was incorporated into this analysis, and these variables are likely to influence lean mass outcomes.\n Fifth, the duration of the measurement window varied across members and was determined by the interval between peak\n and nadir weight rather than a fixed protocol period.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e4.2 Future Directions\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eProspective controlled study designs with standardized measurement protocols, dietary and exercise co-variate\n capture, and DXA-validated BIA calibration would provide stronger evidence for the role of high-frequency monitoring\n and AI-guided adherence in lean mass preservation during GLP‑1 therapy. Subgroup analyses examining the impact of\n engagement frequency, protein intake, resistance training participation, and GLP‑1 agent on lean mass outcomes would\n further characterize the mechanisms underlying these findings.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e5. CONCLUSIONS\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong 6,990 Hume Health premium members on GLP‑1 therapy who met defined body composition monitoring and AI protocol\n engagement criteria, the weighted mean lean mass loss as a percentage of total weight lost was 16.9%. This is\n substantially below the 25–39% range reported in published GLP‑1 clinical trial literature. The median lean mass loss\n was 19.4%. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that high-frequency tissue-level monitoring, combined\n with AI-guided protocol adherence and physician oversight informed by body composition data, supports favorable lean\n mass outcomes during medically assisted weight loss. Prospective controlled research is needed to confirm these\n findings and to isolate the active components of the platform protocol.\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n \n\u003ch4\u003eREFERENCES\u003c\/h4\u003e\n \n\u003cp\u003e1. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. N Engl\n J Med. 2021;384(11):989–1002. doi:10.1056\/NEJMoa2032183.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Neeland IJ, Linge J, Birkenfeld AL. Changes in lean body mass with glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies and\n mitigation strategies. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(Suppl 4):16–27. doi:10.1111\/dom.15728.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Prado CM, Phillips SM, Gonzalez MC, Heymsfield SB. Muscle matters: the effects of medically induced weight loss on\n skeletal muscle. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12(11):785–787. doi:10.1016\/S2213-8587(24)00272-9.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Davies M, et al. Weight regain and cardiometabolic effects after withdrawal of\n semaglutide: The STEP 1 trial extension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24(8):1553–1564. doi:10.1111\/dom.14725.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Hume Health Corp. Lean Mass Preservation in GLP‑1 Members: An Internal Outcomes Analysis. 2024. Analysis of 6,990\n premium members. Methodology available on request: research@humehealth.com.\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6. Ravussin E, Bogardus C. Skeletal muscle metabolism is a major determinant of resting energy expenditure. J Appl\n Physiol. 1989;66(3). PMID:2243122.\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n \n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eDisclosure Statement\n \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis analysis was conducted by Hume Health Corp using data from the Hume Health platform. Hume Health Corp is the\n developer of the body composition monitoring hardware (Hume Body Pod) and AI guidance system (Pro.f) evaluated in this\n analysis. No external funding was received. The analysis has not undergone independent peer review. Investigators have\n an inherent commercial interest in the outcomes described.\u003c\/p\u003e" }, "width": 750, "transitionDuration": 150 }

As seen in

7 Reasons Owners Say the Hume Pod Is Spot On With Their InBody

We did not write these. Real Hume Pod owners lined it up against their gym's InBody and their clinic's DEXA. Here are seven reasons they trust the one that lives on their bathroom floor.

An InBody is the body-composition machine most gyms and studios use as their benchmark, the read people trust after a session. The fastest way to know whether an at-home scanner is any good is to line it up against that. Hume Pod owners keep doing exactly that, checking it against their InBody and their DEXA, and coming back impressed. The Hume Pod reads 8 points in about a minute for fat, muscle, visceral fat and 45+ metrics, within roughly 2 to 3% of DEXA under consistent conditions. And where an InBody is a gym trip you take once in a while, this one lives on your floor, so the real win is not just matching that read, it is watching your own trend any morning you want. Here are seven reasons, in owners' own words, it earns the comparison.

Owner-verified against InBody and DEXA
One-time $183, no subscription
45 days to try it at home

4.7★: 48,252 verified reviews
~2-3%: Of a DEXA reading
8 sensors: Hands and feet

See the 7 Reasons ↓ Get Yours & Save 49%

Reason 1

"Blown away at how close it is to my gym's InBody scan"

That is a verbatim Hume Pod review, and it is the one owners repeat most. People who already pay for InBody scans at their gym try the Pod at home, expect a downgrade, and are surprised by how closely the two line up.

The Pod uses the same kind of read a gym machine does: 8 electrodes across both hands and both feet with multi-frequency signals, not one current through your feet. That is why the comparison holds up instead of falling apart. Verified owner reviews, quoted as written.

Reason 2

"Scheduled a DEXA a few hours after the Pod"

Pod trend DEXA

body fat %, week over weekwithin ~2-3% of DEXA

Trusted by Dr. Yaz Dominguez Board-certified Family Medicine, DO@doctor_yaz

Another real review: an owner booked a clinic DEXA the same afternoon to test the Pod head to head. Their words: not identical, but close enough to feel confident at home. In third-party testing the Hume Pod tracked within roughly 2 to 3% of DEXA under consistent conditions.

That is the whole promise of an at-home scanner. You are not replacing the occasional lab scan, you are filling the months between them with a trend you can trust. A reliable direction, not a single clinical reading.

Pod trend DEXA

body fat %, week over weekwithin ~2-3% of DEXA

Trusted by Dr. Yaz Dominguez Board-certified Family Medicine, DO@doctor_yaz

The Hume Pod in Numbers

4.7★

48,252 owners

~2-3%

Of a DEXA reading

8 points

Hands and feet

$0/mo

No subscription, ever

Verified reviews quoted as written. Body-composition insights and trends, not a diagnosis.

The Hume Pod

£143~~£279~~Save 49%

No subscription · 45-day home trial

Get the Hume Pod

Reason 3

"The Pod showed me my muscle held" on a GLP-1

Same scale weight170 lb

Body A fatmuscle

Body B fatmuscle

Same number on the scale. Only the Pod shows the split.

Recommended by Ana Reisdorf Bariatric Dietitian, MS RD

From a verified owner down 30 pounds on a GLP-1: the Pod showed me my muscle held, that's the number I cared about. On a GLP-1, weight leaves fast and some of it can be muscle, and a scale calls all of it progress.

Owners use the Pod to watch fat come down while lean mass holds, week to week, and bring that to their provider. It tracks your composition, it does not treat or manage your plan. Insights and trends for general wellness, never a diagnosis.

Same scale weight170 lb

Body A fatmuscle

Body B fatmuscle

Same number on the scale. Only the Pod shows the split.

Recommended by Ana Reisdorf Bariatric Dietitian, MS RD

Reason 4

An InBody means a gym trip. This lives on your floor.

Hume Pod

Scale

DEXA

Fat vs muscle

8-point segmental

Visceral fat trend

Metabolic age read

Cost to track

$183 once

~$40

$150+ each

Typical published pricing. DEXA is the lab reference; the Pod tracks the same trend at home, within ~2-3% under consistent conditions.

The reason owners switch is not that the InBody is bad, it is that it is somewhere else. A gym membership, a drive, a booking, a technician. Most people scan it a handful of times a year, which is not enough to see a trend.

The Hume Pod is a one-time $183 that reads the same kind of segmental body composition on your bathroom floor, any morning, as often as you like. The same category of read, none of the friction. Typical published pricing shown.

Hume Pod

Scale

DEXA

Fat vs muscle

8-point segmental

Visceral fat trend

Metabolic age read

Cost to track

$183 once

~$40

$150+ each

Typical published pricing. DEXA is the lab reference; the Pod tracks the same trend at home, within ~2-3% under consistent conditions.

Reason 5

The metrics owners keep coming back to

Metabolic Age

23yrs

YoungerOlder

Age 31 yrs

A directional read, not a clinical age.

Trusted by Dr. Kevin Joseph Internal Medicine, DO

A verified owner on what keeps them scanning: my favorites are the visceral fat index and the metabolic age, watching them trend down over the year is genuinely satisfying. The Pod reads more than 45 metrics from one 60-second scan.

It is not just a body-fat percentage. Fat, muscle and water, a visceral fat index, a metabolic age and more, all tracked as trends in the app. Metabolic age is a directional read for general wellness, not a clinical age.

Metabolic Age

23yrs

YoungerOlder

Age 31 yrs

A directional read, not a clinical age.

Trusted by Dr. Kevin Joseph Internal Medicine, DO

What Hume Pod Owners Say

Kevin C. Verified

"Blown away at how close it is to my gym's InBody scan."

Sophie M. Verified

"Scheduled a DEXA a few hours after the Pod. Not identical, but close enough to feel confident at home."

Regina B. Verified

"My favorites are the visceral fat index and the metabolic age. Watching them trend down over the year is genuinely satisfying."

4.7 · 48,252 verified reviews

The Hume Pod

£143~~£279~~Save 49%

No subscription · 45-day home trial

Get the Hume Pod

Reason 6

After the honeymoon, owners trust the trend

One more real review, on how people actually use it: first few days I checked every metric, after a week focusing on trends made everything clearer. And another: it breaks down body fat percentage, muscle mass and water weight, so I can actually see what's happening.

That is the pattern owners describe: the novelty of 45+ numbers settles into a simple habit of watching a few trends move. Scan under the same conditions, follow the direction, and the picture stays honest.

Reason 7

Line it up against your own InBody. 45 days to be sure.

Hume Pod, own it once for £143, was £279

Limited time offer --:--:-- Own it once. No subscription.

Own it once £143 ~~£279~~−49% 45-day at-home trial · free shipping · HSA/FSA eligible

You do not have to take the reviews on faith. Use the Hume Pod at home for 45 days, take it to your next gym InBody or clinic DEXA, and see how close it lands for you.

If it does not earn the comparison, send it back for a full refund. One-time $183, HSA/FSA eligible, free shipping, no subscription ever.

Rated 4.7 stars by 48,252 owners. One-time $183, was $352, a 50% launch saving. HSA/FSA eligible.

Limited time offer --:--:-- Own it once. No subscription.

Own it once £143 ~~£279~~−49% 45-day at-home trial · free shipping · HSA/FSA eligible

Own it once

See why owners trust it

The same read owners line up against their InBody and DEXA, on your own floor. One-time $183, was $352, a 50% launch saving. No subscription, HSA/FSA eligible, free US shipping and a 45-day at-home trial. Pick your option below.

{ "type": "slideout", "contentType": "with_image", "content": { "title": "","image": "//humehealth.com/cdn/shop/files/c490656fdb4b56552dc628dc93e1b0d0f71aacd1_1.png?v=1763044834&width=2116", "imageWidth": "200","imageContent": "\u003ch2\u003eAbout Hume Band\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eHume Band continuously tracks longevity biomarkers like heart rate variability, sleep stages, recovery status, blood oxygen, strain levels, and more - then tells you exactly how to improve them in plain english.\u003c\/p\u003e", "secondaryContent": "\u003ch4\u003eThe only wearable for longevity optimization\u003c\/h4\u003e\u003cp\u003eHume Band tracks what actually determines how long you live healthy, such as metabolic momentum, stress adaptation, sleep quality, and recovery trends.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur Longevity Health Monitoring system reveals information like whether your health span is improving, what’s sabotaging your recovery, early signs of illness and much more.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch4\u003eHow does it work?\u003c\/h4\u003e\u003cp\u003eHume Band uses 5 LEDs and 4 photodiodes to capture your health data more frequently than most wearables - delivering best-in-class accuracy validated in lab studies and third-party testing. The biomarkers these sensors monitor are:\u003cbr\/\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eHeart Rate Variability (HRV)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eHeart rate\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eBlood Oxygen Levels (SpO2)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRespiratory Rate\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eSkin Temperature\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eSleep Stages (Light, Deep, REM, Awake)\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eActivity Levels \u0026 Movement Patterns\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eStrain\u003c\/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRecovery Status\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ol\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdvanced algorithms analyze these biomarkers to detect patterns you can't see: stress buildup, declining recovery capacity, poor sleep quality, metabolic dysfunction, overtraining signals, and more.\u003c\/p\u003e" }, "width": 750, "transitionDuration": 700 }

{ "type": "slideout", "contentType": "with_image", "content": { "title": "","image": "//humehealth.com/cdn/shop/files/frame_2134722382_addf2038-a174-478d-99d7-73233976e8ed.webp?v=1766611433&width=870", "imageWidth": "200","imageContent": "\u003ch3\u003eHow Hume Pod tracks fat loss\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Pod measures body composition, not just weight. This means you see exactly how much fat you're losing versus muscle, water, or other tissue. It eliminates the guesswork that makes traditional scales unreliable during weight loss.\u003c\/p\u003e", "secondaryContent": "\u003ch4\u003eWhat gets measured\u003c\/h4\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1. Body Fat Percentage \u0026 Mass\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eYour total fat as a percentage of body weight, plus absolute kilograms of fat tissue. The primary metric for tracking actual fat loss.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2. Muscle Mass\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eTotal lean tissue mass. Maintaining muscle during weight loss preserves your metabolism and makes long-term results sustainable.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3. Visceral Fat Level\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eInternal abdominal fat linked to disease risk. Measured on a 1-59 scale (1-12 is healthy range).\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4. Water Weight\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eSeparated into intracellular and extracellular water. Explains daily fluctuations unrelated to actual fat gain or loss.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5. Segmental Breakdown\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eFat % and muscle mass measured separately in arms, legs, and trunk. Shows where composition changes are occurring.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6. Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eDaily calories burned at rest. Tracks whether muscle is being preserved (BMR stable) or lost (BMR declining).\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch4\u003eWhy this matters\u003c\/h4\u003e\u003cp\u003eA 2kg weight loss could be 2kg of fat (ideal) or 1.5kg muscle + 0.5kg fat (poor outcome). Traditional scales can't tell the difference. The Pod can, so you know if your approach is actually working.\u003c\/p\u003e" }, "width": 750, "transitionDuration": 700 }

{ "type": "slideout", "contentType": "with_image", "content": { "title": "","image": "//humehealth.com/cdn/shop/files/frame_2134722382_addf2038-a174-478d-99d7-73233976e8ed.webp?v=1766611433&width=870", "imageWidth": "200","imageContent": "\u003ch3\u003eHow Hume Pod tracks athleticism\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Pod measures muscle mass and body composition to show whether your training is actually building muscle, where that muscle is being added, and whether you're developing symmetrically. This removes guesswork from strength training and lets you verify that your program is producing results.\u003c\/p\u003e", "secondaryContent": "\u003ch4\u003eWhat gets measured\u003c\/h4\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1. Skeletal Muscle Mass\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eTotal functional muscle tissue in kilograms. The primary metric for tracking muscle gain from resistance training.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2. Segmental Muscle Analysis\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eMuscle mass measured separately for right arm, left arm, trunk, right leg, and left leg. Shows regional muscle development and identifies imbalances.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3. Muscle Symmetry\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eAutomatic detection of greater than 5% muscle mass difference between left and right limbs. Flags potential imbalances from injury compensation or uneven training.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4. Muscle-to-Fat Ratio\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eDirect comparison of lean tissue to fat tissue. Tracks body recomposition (building muscle while losing fat simultaneously).\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5. Protein Levels\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eTotal protein content in body tissue. Indicator of adequate protein intake and muscle protein synthesis.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6. Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eDaily calorie burn at rest. Increases as you build muscle (approximately 13 calories per kg of muscle tissue).\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e7. Body Fat Percentage\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eShows whether you're gaining quality weight (muscle) or excess fat during bulking phases.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch4\u003eWhy this matters\u003c\/h4\u003e\u003cp\u003eYou can gain 5kg and not know if it's muscle or fat. The Pod shows exactly what tissue you're adding, where it's going, and whether both sides of your body are developing evenly. This turns training from guesswork into measurable progress.\u003c\/p\u003e" }, "width": 750, "transitionDuration": 700 }

{ "type": "slideout", "contentType": "with_image", "content": { "title": "","image": "//humehealth.com/cdn/shop/files/frame_2134722382_addf2038-a174-478d-99d7-73233976e8ed.webp?v=1766611433&width=870", "imageWidth": "200","imageContent": "\u003ch3\u003eHow Hume Pod tracks longevity markers\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Pod measures metabolic age, visceral fat, and body composition indicators linked to long-term health outcomes. These metrics help you understand your biological age versus chronological age and track internal health markers associated with disease risk.\u003c\/p\u003e", "secondaryContent": "\u003ch4\u003eWhat gets measured\u003c\/h4\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1. Metabolic Age\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eYour metabolic profile compared to population averages. A 55-year-old with composition matching the average 48-year-old shows metabolic age of 48.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2. Skeletal Muscle Mass\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eMuscle tissue preservation is one of the strongest predictors of healthy aging. Muscle loss (sarcopenia) accelerates after age 40 without resistance training.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3. Bone Mineral Content\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eBone density tracking. Declining bone mass increases fracture risk and loss of functional independence. Critical marker especially for women post-menopause.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4. Muscle-to-Fat Ratio\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eLean tissue relative to fat tissue. Higher ratios associated with better metabolic health, insulin sensitivity, and reduced chronic disease risk.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5. Body Fat Distribution\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eTotal body fat percentage and segmental fat tracking. Excess fat, especially trunk and visceral fat, increases inflammation and metabolic dysfunction.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6. Basal Metabolic Rate\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\/\u003eDaily resting calorie burn. Preservation or improvement indicates maintained metabolic health. Declining BMR suggests metabolic aging.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch4\u003eWhy this matters\u003c\/h4\u003e\u003cp\u003eHealthy aging isn't about staying thin, it's about maintaining muscle mass, bone density, minimizing visceral fat, and preserving metabolic function. The Pod tracks these markers so you can measure whether your habits are supporting long-term health or contributing to biological aging and disease risk.\u003c\/p\u003e" }, "width": 750, "transitionDuration": 700 }

Black electronic device with a handle on a white background

48,252+ Reviews

The Hume Pod

£0

Shop Now

Finally, see the results you've been chasing

Stop guessing if your efforts are working. The Hume Pod gives you real insight into your body so you can take control and reach your goals — whether it’s burning fat, building muscle, improving posture, or slowing aging.

Why it's so hard...

Most scales lie. You can be losing muscle instead of fat without knowing.

Day-to-day weight swings make it impossible to tell if your efforts are working.

You never know if your diet or fitness program is actually making a difference.

How Hume Pod changes that...

See exactly what you're losing — fat, muscle, or water — in real time.

Watch your body fat % drop even when the scale doesn't budge.

Stop obsessing over daily fluctuations and finally see true progress.

Man using Hume Body Pod scale with handheld sensor at home, with overlay showing muscle gain and fat loss progress along with body fat percentage and weight trends.

Stay On Track With Hume Pod

Why it's so hard...

Most people only track total weight, not muscle gain, so you never know if your workouts are actually working.

Muscle imbalances cause back pain, poor posture, and weak performance.

Losing strength while dieting makes your body feel older, slower, and less capable.

How Hume Pod changes that...

Track muscle gain, not just total weight, so you have real clarity on your progress.

Identify asymmetries and correct imbalances for a stronger, more balanced body.

Take control of your training and see improvements in strength, posture, and performance over time.

Man stretching outdoors in a park wearing a Hume Band, with overlay showing biological age vs chronological age and improved energy and metabolic health insights.

Get Stronger With Hume Pod

Why it's so hard...

Visceral fat, metabolic age, and bone loss happen quietly — until it’s too late.

Traditional scales give no insight into hidden health risks.

You don’t know if your lifestyle is actually protecting you from aging or disease.

How Hume Pod changes that...

Track visceral fat, bone density, and metabolic age to take action before problems arise.

See the impact of your daily habits on your long-term health.

Make choices that slow aging, reduce hidden risks, and keep you active for years to come.

Person holding smartphone displaying Hume Body Pod app with full body composition analysis, with Hume Body Pod scale visible on the floor for connected health tracking.

Live Healthier With Hume Pod

Designed by experts. Trusted by those who test limits.

From world champions to everyday heroes, Hume Health is the future of human performance and longevity

Sarah Bacon

3x Olympic Silver Medalist

"For diving, small changes matter. This helps me see what’s really changing."

Sarah Bacon

Tim Biohacker

Europe’s Leading Biohacker

"As a biohacker, I've tried countless body analyzers, and Hume's Body Pod is one of the most accurate I've found for tracking fat and muscle mass. Precision matters because body composition is what really drives longevity, performance, and metabolic health."

Tim Biohacker

Brianna McNeal

Olympic Silver Medalist

"It helps me understand how my body adapts to speed work, strength training, and recovery."

Brianna McNeal

"Linking to Apple Health was simple and the app works great, love the recommendations."

Jorge

Belal Muhammad

2x UFC World Champion

"Training and weight cuts are demanding. This gives me clearer insight into how my body is handling both."

Belal Muhammad

Emily Loogman

3x CrossFit Games

"With the mix of lifting and endurance in CrossFit, understanding body composition is far more useful than tracking weight alone."

Emily Loogman

Frank Gore

5× NFL Pro Bowl

"Longevity in football comes down to how well your body holds up. This gives clearer insight than weight alone."

Frank Gore

"The scale is easy to use and provides a lot of helpful health info for your health journey."

Debbye Lewis

Sarah Bacon

3x Olympic Silver Medalist

"For diving, small changes matter. This helps me see what’s really changing."

Sarah Bacon

Tim Biohacker

Europe’s Leading Biohacker

"Hume's Pod is one of the most accurate I've found for tracking fat and muscle mass."

Tim Biohacker

"Linking to Apple Health was simple and the app works great, love the recommendations."

Jorge

Frank Gore

5× NFL Pro Bowl

"Longevity in football comes down to how well your body holds up. This gives clearer insight than weight alone."

Frank Gore

Brianna McNeal

Olympic Silver Medalist

"It helps me understand how my body adapts to speed work, strength training, and recovery."

Brianna McNeal

Belal Muhammad

2x UFC World Champion

"Training and weight cuts are demanding. This gives me clearer insight into how my body is handling both."

Belal Muhammad

Emily Loogman

3x CrossFit Games

"With CrossFit, understanding body composition is very useful due to it's multi-disciplines"

Emily Loogman

"The scale is easy to use and provides a lot of helpful health info for your health journey."

Debbye Lewis

Same accuracy, costs less than three DEXA visits

Why pay $100 per DEXA scan when you can get accurate body insights at home, anytime.

0%

98%

WITHIN ~3% OF A DEXA SCAN, BASED ON INDEPENDENT TESTING

50

60

70

80

90

100

Fat Mass

0%

Muscle Mass

0%

Visceral Fat

0%

Water Weight

0%

DEXA Scan

Body Scan Accuracy (%)

“Impressed by the granularity in the app”

Sean D.F

VERIFIED BUYER
“Free version provides all of the data I need”

Katie C

VERIFIED BUYER
“This tech made me proactive”

Margie L

VERIFIED BUYER
@amyinhalf
“The data that it provides is invaluable!”

Brian

VERIFIED BUYER
“Neat to see the daily progress”

Guy N

VERIFIED BUYER
“Me and my wife compare data every night”

Jerry C

VERIFIED BUYER
@nimai_delgado
“Rewarding when you have some raw data”

Scott J

VERIFIED BUYER
“Easy to use, great connectivity!”

Wendy

VERIFIED BUYER
“The app gives trends & comparisons”

Layla

VERIFIED BUYER
@drnicolemartin

See All Reviews

Get better results with deeper insights

0%

Reached their desired weight within 5 months

0%

Felt significantly healthier and more motivated after just 30 days

0%

Made healthier choices and built healthier habits within 60 days

Based on a survey including n=60 current Hume members evaluating self-perceived efficacy.

Track 45 metrics that impact weight loss and muscle gain

Designed to help you lose fat and gain muscle, the Hume Pod gives you the data you need to push further and see real results. Track over 45 body metrics with unmatched accuracy and gain clear insights that help you achieve your fitness goals.

Athletic woman running outdoors wearing a Hume Band, with overlay showing body metrics like metabolic age, lean mass, body fat mass, and hydration levels for performance tracking.

Stop letting weight fluctuations hide your progress

Hume Pod uses multi‑frequency BIA (bioelectrical impedance analysis) to visualize fat and muscle changes in your midsection, legs, back, arms and everywhere else. Instead of obsessing over a single scale number, you can see what’s actually changing.

Think of it as your personal GPS, guiding you on the fastest route to your individual health goals for easy and effective weight loss.

Take Control of Your Progress

Man jogging outdoors in a forest wearing a Hume Band, with overlay showing body composition progress including total weight, muscle mass increase, and fat mass reduction.

98% accuracy brings lab-quality analysis home

Hume Pod has been validated by third‑party studies, delivering reliable, repeatable body composition readings so you can see fat loss vs. muscle gain clearly and stay confident when progress feels invisible. See accuracy report.

Infographic showing Hume Pod accuracy compared to medical-grade analyzer with human body visualization and metrics like BMI, visceral fat, muscle mass, bone mass, and BMR, highlighting 98% and 99% accuracy.

Multiple people can use it, each with their own app profile

We know that keeping your loved ones healthy can be tough. The Hume Pod is designed for family sharing—register up to 24 users and monitor them independently. It’s free and easy to use. Keep your family and friends healthy with powerful data at your fingertips.

Start Tracking Together

Mother exercising on a yoga mat with her baby wearing a Hume Band, with app overlays showing weight tracking for the mother and body composition score for the child.

Easily connect with popular health apps

Seamlessly sync your data with Apple Health, Google Fit, and Samsung Health for a comprehensive view of your health journey. Stay motivated and informed as you take charge of your wellness with a body analyzer that fits your chosen device.

Pro athletes, trainers, and doctors trust our biometrics

There is a reason why the Hume Pod is the #1 choice for professionals all across the world: it’s used in leading weight loss clinics and gyms for its accuracy and reliability. With its user-friendly design, the Hume Pod enhances accountability and helps individuals achieve their health goals.

Train With Clearer Insight

Customer testimonials for Hume Body Pod featuring Frank Gore, Adriene Duarte, and Jared Taylor, with media logos from The New York Times, The Verge, and Men’s Health and HSA/FSA eligibility note.

Spot imbalances early, while they’re still easy to fix

See how weight and muscle are distributed across your upper and lower body. Spot imbalances early, understand what’s driving them, and adjust training or recovery before they affect performance or increase injury risk.

Users who track their progress reach their health goals 8x faster.

Older woman exercising on a yoga mat wearing a Hume Band, with app insight showing unbalanced upper and lower body weight ratio and recommendations for improvement.

Get free worldwide express shipping

We take great pride in handling all of our own research and development, design, manufacturing, shipping and customer service from our headquarters, east of San Francisco in Benicia, California.

Secure Express Delivery

Hume Body Pod scale with global map background highlighting worldwide shipping, free app included, up to 10-year warranty, and 45-day money-back guarantee.

Your wins are worth sharing

One click to share your scan with anyone. Perfect for trainers who need to see progress between sessions, accountability partners who keep you honest, or friends who are routing for you—complete with trends, composition changes, and all the metrics that matter.

Person standing on Hume Body Pod scale with smartphone displaying health score and body composition metrics, alongside messages showing fat loss progress and motivation.

Your 45 day at-home trial

Try our smart scale risk-free with a 45-day at home trial. It’s like putting a temporary deposit on your device. For 45 days, you can track your weight, heart rate, body composition, and see real results.

If you're not satisfied, return it and get your deposit back—no questions asked. Your health, your way, with zero commitment.

Start Your Home Trial

Designed for every age and body type

Hume Pod tracks accurately up to 400 lbs across all body and age ranges. With age and population-specific benchmarks built in, you're not comparing yourself to averages that don't reflect your reality.

Black electronic device with text highlighting features on a blurred background

Our patented technology is trusted by over 1.2 million users

Explore real reviews from people using body data to guide training, recovery, and everyday health decisions.

"Blown away at how close it is to my gym's InBody scan"

"Scheduled a DEXA a few hours after the Pod"

"The Pod showed me my muscle held" on a GLP-1

An InBody means a gym trip. This lives on your floor.

The metrics owners keep coming back to

After the honeymoon, owners trust the trend

Line it up against your own InBody. 45 days to be sure.

See why owners trust it

The Hume Pod

The Hume Pod

Not satisfied within 45 days? Get a full refund

Looking for more information?

How can I be sure it’s as accurate as you claim?

What can I track?

Does Hume Pod actually work?

Can it be used by multiple users?

How to get the most accurate results

Shipping & Returns

FAQs

1. Is the app free?

2. What are the technical specifications?

3. Does it sync with my Fitbit or Apple?

4. Are these technologies safe?

5. Does it show weekly trends in a graph?

6. What does my warranty cover?

7. If I don’t like it, can I return it?

8. What is the maximum weight?

Finally, see the results you've been chasing

Why it's so hard...

How Hume Pod changes that...

Why it's so hard...

How Hume Pod changes that...

Why it's so hard...

How Hume Pod changes that...

Finally, see the results you've been chasing

Designed by experts. Trusted by those who test limits.

Sarah Bacon

Tim Biohacker

Brianna McNeal

Belal Muhammad

Emily Loogman

Frank Gore

Sarah Bacon

Tim Biohacker

Frank Gore

Brianna McNeal

Belal Muhammad

Emily Loogman

Same accuracy, costs less than three DEXA visits

“Impressed by the granularity in the app”

“Free version provides all of the data I need”

“This tech made me proactive”

“The data that it provides is invaluable!”

“Neat to see the daily progress”

“Me and my wife compare data every night”

“Rewarding when you have some raw data”

“Easy to use, great connectivity!”

“The app gives trends & comparisons”

Get better results with deeper insights

Track 45 metrics that impact weight loss and muscle gain

Stop letting weight fluctuations hide your progress

98% accuracy brings lab-quality analysis home

Multiple people can use it, each with their own app profile

Easily connect with popular health apps

Pro athletes, trainers, and doctors trust our biometrics

Spot imbalances early, while they’re still easy to fix

Get free worldwide express shipping

Your wins are worth sharing

Your 45 day at-home trial

Designed for every age and body type

Our patented technology is trusted by over 1.2 million users

Does the Hume Pod Actually Work?

Is the app free?

Can it be used by multiple users?

Are these technologies safe?

Does it show weekly trends in a graph?

What Does my Warranty Cover?

If I don’t like it? Can I return it?

What is the maximum weight?

Weighing-in for the first time?